Psychiatrisation of Dissent: The Incredible Story of Fano’s Student

0
287

From Mad in Italy: “Precisely for this reason, psychiatric diagnosis, to be acceptable and plausible in a liberal and democratic rule of law, cannot and must never be used for the repression of political dissent or to counter unwelcome opinions in power or in contrast to the opinions of the majority: the same Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) significantly warns the need to emphasize that ‘socially deviant behaviors (e.g., political, religious or sexual) and conflicts that arise primarily between the individual and society are not mental disorders’.”

Read the full article here and the English translation here.

SHARE
Previous articlePsychiatric assessments impacted by gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, study finds
Next articleThe “Madness” of Inpatient Psychiatry
MITUK’s mission is to serve as a catalyst for fundamentally re-thinking theory and practice in the field of mental health in the UK, and promoting positive change. We believe that the current diagnostically-based paradigm of care has comprehensively failed, and that the future lies in non-medical alternatives which explicitly acknowledge the causal role of social and relational conflicts, abuses, adversities and injustices.